Skis and Gear Discussion > Skis 4 Me -- Suggestions or Advice??

Demo list for Perry

<< < (3/3)

Svend:
Perry, I wouldn't be hesitant to go to a 184 for the Peak 84.  My comments about maneuverability were meant more in a relative sense, when compared to say, an Outland 87, or a light Fischer or Atomic.  The Peak 84 in the 184 were by no means hard to bring around -- I could make short, long, medium turns at will.  It was very easy to ski in that length.  It's just not as light and flickable as other skis I've tried; simply more damp, more measured in it's movements.  Sort of in between say a light agile Fischer, and a damp crudbuster Dynastar (if you've ever tried one of those...Mythic Rider, Sultan 94, for example). 

The tip of the Peak 84 is rather soft, and that makes it easy to bend and crank out short turns -- just pressure the tips, lay 'em over and bring 'em round.  They do not lock you into one turn shape either, which is a quality I really value in a ski.  Once in a turn, you can basically make them go where you want and change direction easily.

So, if this is to be primarily a western ski, I don't have any problem recommending the 184 length to you.  But you can ask Gary - he was with me the day I demoed these.  He is a pretty observant bloke, and doesn't miss much. 

LivingProof:
I had a phone discussion with Philpug yesterday, and, was talking about the Rev 85 as a possible candidate for my Big Sky March trip. Phil is very positive about the 85 and felt it would be a great fit for me as I'm a short radius turner, rather than a GS ripper. So if the right deal shows up, I may do it.

As to length, I'm inclined to go shorter as the reduced turning radius fits my style better. I've spent this season on a shorter Hart Pulse (170 when the traditional thinking would recommend a 178) and I've no regrets whatsoever, but, that's solely based on what makes me happy. So if I get a Head 85 it will be the 178. BTW, I happen to like the black based Rev graphics.

Perry, mentioned Gary and his FX 84 vs MX 78. In NY last week, 3 of 4 days he used the MX 78 as the snow was traditional east coast packed hard stuff.  He told me the prime difference between the two skis was the MX's hold the edge until a distinct releasing movements occur, whereas, FX 84 initiated turns much easier, a plus in soft snow. Gary did modify the rear of his MX 78 to ease the releasing aspects. I hope he chimes in, but, that's my interpretation.

All this fine tuning makes my head hurt! We had 10 people skiing last week, nobody said their skis sucked.  ;D

Perry:
LP - I just pulled the trigger on Rev 85. 184cm (actual dims are 86  under foot) $500 with binding.  hard to beat.  PM me if you want info

byronm:
That makes two of us Perry......mine came in today 170 cm with PRD14's....and Dan....no go on the "trade"....I had them mounted when I ordered....and they are way too sexy :P 
 
Perry.....I demo'd a set for two days and was really impressed. I have some...but not a ton of time on various other skis in this category so my comparitive ability is limited. Nonetheless, they are stable, forgiving of flawed technique (+1 for me) and reward when I accidentally get it right.......Enjoy
 
 

dan.boisvert:

--- Quote from: byronm on February 12, 2013, 06:41:56 pm ---That makes two of us Perry......mine came in today 170 cm with PRD14's....and Dan....no go on the "trade"....I had them mounted when I ordered....and they are way too sexy :P

--- End quote ---

It was worth a shot.  :D

Have fun with them!

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[*] Previous page