HA - as you noted, I was not trying to compare the Blackeye to the Outland. They are intended to be viewed as separate and distinct reviews. I did enjoy the Blackeye, though. It would make a great eastern all-mtn ski.
Sorry to hear that Dynastar has not tweaked your interest. I have tried an number of their skis over the years, and have liked several, but have also disliked a few. I own the Mythic Rider, which I really like, although the Outland 87 is superior to it in many ways. I liked the Sultan 94 for its solid, smooth, unshakable feel, but it would take a strong and/or heavy skier to make it come alive. The Sultan 85 was too light for my taste, but fun nevertheless. I had a blast on the Contact Cross Ti from a few years ago - a great ski; seems to be similar to the current Speed Cross Ti. I intensely disliked the Contact 4x4 - way too stiff and heavy feeling, like skiing on a couple of 2x4's (pardon the pun
).
By comparison, I would say the Outland 87 is the most playful feeling of the bunch (with the possible exception of the Sultan 85), yet still maintains that solid, dependable, predictable go-anywhere feel that I like about Dynastar skis. I'd be interested to hear your impressions if you try a pair.
I would love to try the Speed Course Ti, the electric blue ski - it is supposed to be fantastic.
Speaking of Scott skis, I would love to try the Crusade, but doubt I will ever find one here in Canada to demo. I have only read glowing reviews on those. Apparently as capable and fun on the hard pack as it is off-piste. How do you like yours?
Home
Login
Register