Author Topic: Wider Skis for Me?  (Read 1075 times)

Avalanchis

  • Guest
Wider Skis for Me?
« on: October 28, 2011, 08:36:36 am »
Hello,

I'm a level 6-7 skier, 5'9" and 180 lbs.  I live near Vail, CO and I ski around 50 days a season. 

I'm currently skiing on a pair of Blizzard Magnum 8.1 in the 172mm length.  I really like these skis, but I feel that they are still a bit above my current ability level.

I still spend a lot of time on the groomers, but I'm considering buying a wider pair of skis for the powder days and when I venture back to the bowls.

I'm looking for recommendations for skis in the 100mm wide range which would be good for a progressing intermediate skier.  It seems like something with some rocker might be a good idea.

Some of the skis I'm considering are:

Blizzard Cochise
Blizzard The One
Liberty Helix
Icelantic Nomad

Any thoughts on these or other skis that fit these requirements?

Thanks!

Alan




jim-ratliff

  • 6+ Year Member
  • 1000 Posts
  • ******
  • Posts: 2739
Re: Wider Skis for Me?
« Reply #1 on: October 28, 2011, 09:57:57 am »
I'm sure others will chime in, but a couple of thoughts.  I'm more a fan of early rise than true rocker. To quote the Liberty site regarding their "stealth rocker". 
Quote from: Liberty skis
Gradual tip rocker with camber under foot and a flat tail for easy turn initiation and great soft snow performance without sacrificing edge grip and energy return.
I've always liked Icelantic skis, their graphics are awesome and several people here have had Icelantic over the years.
Width. I went from an 84mm waisted ski to a 101mm waisted ski last year, and sometimes that feels like a big difference.  I think you are wise in looking in the 98-105 range rather than making a really big jump. Check out Bushwacka's comments about 98 vs 109 width in the review below.

I'm curious.  You say you "like the Blizzard 8.1" but that "it's still a bit above my current level." Can you say more.
What was your thought in narrowing to the 2 Blizzards you did.  The Bonafide might be a better choice than The One (but all of these are full rocker). You might consider adding a Watea 98 to your list for something that is easier.
Wait and see what some of the better, more knowledgeable skiers have to say.


Also, see this review pertinent to your ski list by Bushwacka.
http://www.realskiers.smfnew.com/index.php/topic,1859.msg15410.html#msg15410
« Last Edit: October 28, 2011, 11:42:27 am by jim-ratliff »
"If you're gonna play the game boy, ya gotta learn to play it right."

bushwacka

  • Instructor
  • 400 Posts
  • **
  • Posts: 471
Re: Wider Skis for Me?
« Reply #2 on: October 28, 2011, 01:39:14 pm »
just want to spell out some facts....

-"The one" is flat camber underfoot with tip and tail rocked, very very gradual
-Bonafide have camber under foot with tip and tail rocker. Its flip core so the ski has alot more edge grip than other similar skis because its torsional stiffer, while being more eager to be flex since the underfoot camber was pressed into.
-Cochise is flat under foot with tip and tail rocker

Progressing intermediate near colorado

since this is only your second ski I would not go super big. 100ish mm skis with enough length float great really especially now that we have rocker.

So here is my list

"The One" in a 177cm or even 184cm

why you should get the one.

1. its easy to ski in all conditions
2. Its super easy to ski on groomers in fact for some lighter skis it has more edge grip than the stiffer bonafide
3. bumps are stupid easy on it.
4. fun playfully and poppy
5.not wide enough to torque my knees

neutral comments

1. its very lively, not damp at all

negatives

1.flex isnt as round as the "freemountain" line, tail can feel to soft
2.get thrown around in crud alot
3. sucks at charging
4. if the edge are dull at all they suck on eastern hardpack or western spring freeze.

Blizzard Cochise is not your ski yet, its by far the most versatile ski I skied last year, and ordered it in a 193cm but its is not what you want. its a stiff near big mountain comp board made for people who think that other people are lame.

Libery Helix- havent skied them

Icelandtic Nomad - I have skied the 181cm  SFT. the soft could be one of the best non rockered off trail skis ever made. I really like this ski and with unlimited funds and loss of Blizzard sponsorship I could own this.


old review of "the one" on TGR archives I honestly do not think anyone in the country has had more time on that ski than me.

http://www.tetongravity.com/forums/archive/index.php?t-189378.html



 

« Last Edit: October 28, 2011, 02:48:46 pm by bushwacka »

Liam

  • Ski Shop/Ski Patrol
  • 200 Posts
  • **
  • Posts: 399
Re: Wider Skis for Me?
« Reply #3 on: November 01, 2011, 12:38:29 pm »
NIce reviews, 'bush.  If I may chime in.  I own and Ski the Nomad SFt in a 181cm and I echo bush's sentiments.   I love it in soft snow at medium speeds  It's very light and easy to maneuver in tight spaces.  Not the best at speed in heavy snow and not my choice for hard snow.  If heavier snow and bigger turns are on the menu, consider the regular Nomad over the SFT.  Oh, be advised that the Nomad waist width is quite a bit larger than the listed 105mm (it's closer to a 111mm). 

I have skied the Liberty Helix, it's another well made indy ski.  However, it is a little stiffer and more powerful than most indy skis at this width and if you are finding your Blizzards a handful, you might have the same experience with the Liberty.

I'd also throw in the Rossi S3.  It's a great skiing ski, especially for an advancing intermediate looking for an all-mountain tool at a resort like vail.  Very easy to turn (and yes it responds well to pivoting as well as tipping), great float, and more energy than one would expect from a ski like this.  It is an excellent 'medium-speed' crud ski.  It has decent camber under foot and a fairly substantial rise at the tip and tail.  I haven't skied the Blizzard The One--but I bet the S3 skis pretty similarly to the One.

I Haven't skied the cochise, but it strikes me as a powerhouse of a ski...maybe not the right ski for you.

How long have you been skiing?

Avalanchis

  • Guest
Re: Wider Skis for Me?
« Reply #4 on: November 01, 2011, 12:48:45 pm »
Thanks everyone for the replies!

I'm curious.  You say you "like the Blizzard 8.1" but that "it's still a bit above my current level." Can you say more.

I'm not sure if I can elaborate effectively about this.  At times it seems a bit stiff for me, and I find it hard to keep the carve going sometimes.

What was your thought in narrowing to the 2 Blizzards you did.

I skied "The One" last year a few times and liked it.  I was interested in the Cochise because of the rocker and flipcore, but from what bushwacka posted, it seems like it is over my head. 

I did have the Bonafide on my list but neglected to mention it.  How well would the Bonafide would match up with my current ability level?

Avalanchis

  • Guest
Re: Wider Skis for Me?
« Reply #5 on: November 01, 2011, 12:58:54 pm »
How long have you been skiing?

I've went skiing a couple of times as a teen and then took a long break.  I'm 45 now.  Over the past 10 years I've skied a couple of times per season.  I moved to the Vail valley last October and last season I skied 53 days.

This season I hope to continue improving.  I can ski most blue runs confidently, and I can "get down" most black runs. 

I'm not great on the bumps but hoping to get better this year.  I'm not very confident in the deeper powder and would especially like to improve in this area.

I don't really ski the trees much, but I enjoy the back bowls and blue sky basin at Vail.

Thanks everyone for the advice!

Alan

Avalanchis

  • Guest
Re: Wider Skis for Me?
« Reply #6 on: November 01, 2011, 01:13:00 pm »
I'd also throw in the Rossi S3.  It's a great skiing ski, especially for an advancing intermediate looking for an all-mountain tool at a resort like vail.  Very easy to turn (and yes it responds well to pivoting as well as tipping), great float, and more energy than one would expect from a ski like this.  It is an excellent 'medium-speed' crud ski.  It has decent camber under foot and a fairly substantial rise at the tip and tail.  I haven't skied the Blizzard The One--but I bet the S3 skis pretty similarly to the One.

I'll definitely add the S3 to my list.

Looking forward to demoing some of these skis soon!

jim-ratliff

  • 6+ Year Member
  • 1000 Posts
  • ******
  • Posts: 2739
Re: Wider Skis for Me?
« Reply #7 on: November 01, 2011, 01:39:47 pm »

Sounds like the Nomad SFT should be high on your list. You may even find you like it on groomed slopes.  I was a bit surprised at Bushwacka's endorsement, I expected him to gravitate to beefier skis.

A bit of background.
BW is a PSIA level III instructor at Stowe. His favorite type of skiing is  pretty obvious from his posts.
Liam is a Ski Patroller at Berkshire East (where ever that might be  :o  ) so his favorite skis may be what makes it easy to ski bumps backwards with a toboggan.
« Last Edit: November 01, 2011, 05:55:33 pm by jim-ratliff »
"If you're gonna play the game boy, ya gotta learn to play it right."

GreenTrails

  • Ski Shop/Ski Patrol
  • <100 Posts
  • **
  • Posts: 16
Re: Wider Skis for Me?
« Reply #8 on: November 01, 2011, 05:51:58 pm »
http://www.powdermag.com/photos/monster-noreastah-ravages-interior-new-england/

Where you'll find Liam, Beastie Boy and me.  Though I'm the only one of the three to have hiked up this year...

jim-ratliff

  • 6+ Year Member
  • 1000 Posts
  • ******
  • Posts: 2739
Re: Wider Skis for Me?
« Reply #9 on: November 01, 2011, 06:01:50 pm »
http://www.powdermag.com/photos/monster-noreastah-ravages-interior-new-england/

Where you'll find Liam, Beastie Boy and me.  Though I'm the only one of the three to have hiked up this year...
Good for you.  Earnin' some early season turns.  That must have felt really different with the leaves still on the trees and that much snow.  I'm a bit jealous, only been in the Backyard Bowl for a couple of runs so far.
"If you're gonna play the game boy, ya gotta learn to play it right."

Liam

  • Ski Shop/Ski Patrol
  • 200 Posts
  • **
  • Posts: 399
Re: Wider Skis for Me?
« Reply #10 on: November 01, 2011, 07:34:37 pm »
Nice, H-man-that deserves an X-post.   Did they get a photo of you as well?? 

I did ski off of the edge of Sugarloaf (South Deerfield, Ma Sugarloaf) that is...much shorter hike.

Liam

bushwacka

  • Instructor
  • 400 Posts
  • **
  • Posts: 471
Re: Wider Skis for Me?
« Reply #11 on: November 01, 2011, 09:25:01 pm »

Sounds like the Nomad SFT should be high on your list. You may even find you like it on groomed slopes.  I was a bit surprised at Bushwacka's endorsement, I expected him to gravitate to beefier skis.

A bit of background.
BW is a PSIA level III instructor at Stowe. His favorite type of skiing is  pretty obvious from his posts.
Liam is a Ski Patroller at Berkshire East (where ever that might be  :o  ) so his favorite skis may be what makes it easy to ski bumps backwards with a toboggan.

I own some beefy skis and want some really beefy skis. I am getting a pair of 193 Cochise to crush snowbird into submission but for the OP or for me skiing at stowe, a 193cm Cochise is not the skis.

The Nomad SFT has gobs of edge grip on hard snow and is stupid easy skiing soft snow or powder. It Icelantic second best  powder tree ski for me after the Gypsies and the best all around. I hate the Shamans(too much sidecut) and dislike the Keeper for tree skiing(to stiff, to much sidecut, to much camber underfoot). Also the SFT is quite capable at All mountain jibbing which makes my inner snowboarder quite happy.

Liam

  • Ski Shop/Ski Patrol
  • 200 Posts
  • **
  • Posts: 399
Re: Wider Skis for Me?
« Reply #12 on: November 02, 2011, 05:59:57 am »
Bush' is right-the jib factor of the Nomad is another plus..it's downright playful and allows even a gaper like me to spin around on blue groomers with ease like a kid.  I think you get the same with the S3.

The Bonafide is a dynamite ski...that might be in short supply as they're pretty hot right now.  You might even go narrower with the Bushwacker, at vail it would be pretty great even in deeper snow (In my few forays out to Colorado, the powder I skied was about a 10th of the water density of what we usually ski in Southern New England...when we have powder).

Bush--have you skied the gypsy???  Maybe next year when I get a new big ski (it's a boot year for me this season) I'd get one...It'd be well and by far the fattest, most rockered ski I ever owned or tried.  I must admit, I get hesistant on ski with a waist width over 115mm.  It's my old-school guilt.


Avalanchis

  • Guest
Re: Wider Skis for Me?
« Reply #13 on: November 02, 2011, 08:16:37 am »
You might even go narrower with the Bushwacker, at vail it would be pretty great even in deeper snow (In my few forays out to Colorado, the powder I skied was about a 10th of the water density of what we usually ski in Southern New England...when we have powder).

Anyone have any experience with the Bushwacker?

According to the Blizzard web site, the target user is:

"Intermediate skiers looking to be advanced by the end of the season!"

Seems like this describes me fairly well.  Its a little narrower than I was considering, but I'm adding it to my list.

bushwacka

  • Instructor
  • 400 Posts
  • **
  • Posts: 471
Re: Wider Skis for Me?
« Reply #14 on: November 02, 2011, 08:45:07 am »
Avalanchis

here is my review of the bushwacker

http://www.realskiers.smfnew.com/index.php/topic,1858.0.html

but to be honest with an 8.1 already in your Stable it would be kinda of Useless to not go up to at least 100mm underfoot. Its a great ski and back east is really nice because its quick enough underfoot, grips ice well enough, and despite not being a top surfing slaving machine it skis powder better than alot of bigger skis. I still think "the one" or the Nomad SFT will be the most fun for you though.

Liam I have skied the Gyspy. Skiershop has a pair of 190 for demo which I skied a couple times at stowe, and I got on pair of 180 out at Alta.  The Full Continuous low rise rocker is very much like a Volkl, which is a good thing for tree skiing. The low rise lets the entire edge engage on non 3d snow but it is never going confuse with a carving ski like a nomad SFT can. Its not hard to ski in any condition though and makes skiing tight places in the woods really fun.